18/01/2017 22:01
Она улетела?
А что там с антигравитацией, "открытой" Горькавым и Васильковым? Я перестал следить за дискуссией после того, как один из авторов у себя в ЖЖ перешел к исследованию жоп своих оппонентов.
Удалось найти в Архиве заметку Марека Абрамовича, в которой без сантиментов (и без жопы) сказано:
The paper by Gorkavyi & Vasilkov (2016) is not even wrong, it is simply
a nonsense. The only question that may be of interest here is — how such
a paper could possibly slip into the Monthly Notices of the Royal astronomical
Society? I may offer just one explanation. I was told a story, perhaps
apocryphal, about a famous referee report (many years ago) by Jim Pringle:
“The paper is so obviously wrong that it should be published as it stands”.
Что еще слышно по теме?
Удалось найти в Архиве заметку Марека Абрамовича, в которой без сантиментов (и без жопы) сказано:
The paper by Gorkavyi & Vasilkov (2016) is not even wrong, it is simply
a nonsense. The only question that may be of interest here is — how such
a paper could possibly slip into the Monthly Notices of the Royal astronomical
Society? I may offer just one explanation. I was told a story, perhaps
apocryphal, about a famous referee report (many years ago) by Jim Pringle:
“The paper is so obviously wrong that it should be published as it stands”.
Что еще слышно по теме?
Tags: